Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Indian food won't kill you!



Anthony Bourdain: Indian food won't kill you 


It’s true, over the years I've enjoyed my share of "cooking shows." There was that wonderful, low, low budget PBS show, The Frugal Gourmet with Jeff Smith, a charming, slightly odd-ball, raconteur who shared with his audience in his buttery voice, his peculiar brand of down to Earth reasonableness as he prepared appealing dishes and set them down in front of the camera. And there was that mega-popular network half hour show that I'd watch with my mom, The Galloping Gourmet. This one starred Graham Kerr who was for us, not only charming, but fascinating with his somewhat flamboyant dress, his British accent not quite like any other we'd heard before, and his habit of sipping a bit too much red wine as he cooked for us… or so I recall. There were many others, of course, Julia Child, Jacques Pepin, Emeril, Lydia Bastianich, and on and on.  But as entertaining and heartwarming as they were, they were hardly ever challenging, hardly ever inspiring (beyond getting you into your own kitchen to venture further than scramble eggs, that is), and certainly, hardly ever truly thought provoking. They were easy to categorize, put in a box, and see as television fluff. Pperhaps fluff with style and substance, but fluff none the less.

 

Over the past decade, this has changed radically, as has American appreciation for food and the event of eating it. Somewhere along the way "cooking shows" have become "food shows" and food, its origins, its preparation, and  its presentation and consumption have become hip! One of the hipsters who has led this charge, who has made being food-wise, food-sophisticated, even food-snarky, and at the very least, food-centric, something that we now all want to be, is Anthony Bourdain.


Unlike Smith and Kerr, though, Anthony is NOT a goof ball, not a food geek or a food dork, he's not even, I believe, by his own admission, a great cook. He comes off, somewhat paradoxically, as a guy who has earned his slightly curmudgeonly outlook on things by virtue of having been through  the mill, a tough mill at that, but one who's still "hungry for more" (one of the intro tag lines from one of his shows) which is why he explores the world, ferreting out the good stuff and providing insightful perspective on our world gone astray, explaining what's cool and what isn't and why. If you haven't seen his shows (that's plural - I'm aware of A Cook's Tour, No Reservations, The Layover, and Parts Unknown. Did I miss any?) you really need to find your way to some episodes and pay attention,  because THIS is GREAT television!


And, before I forget, I've got to mention that if you surf YouTube's search engine you'll find dozens and dozens and dozens of young people who are playing the game of being Anthony Bourdain, posting online their own "show episodes" of themselves traveling the world, sharing their food experiences and their reflections on life for their audiences, wherever and whatever they might be.  When I was growing up kids wanted to be rock stars, now they want to be like globetrotting, tattoo getting, not at all embarrassed to admit that, like Woody Allen, he has no credibility on the dance floor and never catches any fish in contrived food show fishing scenes,  Anthony Bourdain. Hope I did you justice, Anthony!

I'll also mention here that unlike so many other popular TV shows, I can never find free past episodes of Anthony's shows on YouTube. Nope, you can find tons of those little excised snippets of them that give you an idea of what happened in those episodes, but not full ones. But who knows, maybe for someone simply trying to squeeze hours and hours of high quality television viewing into the unrealistic space of a short period of time, this is just as good? But, nah!

OK, enough background and context. Here we have an atypical Bourdain video of Anthony sitting down  to dinner with another grey haired, 50 something-ish, super appealing cable TV personality, Anderson Cooper. As is quickly established in this episode, Anthony plays the role of the experienced guide to planet Earth and the worthwhile and wonderful things it has to offer members of the human race. And Anderson plays his straight man, a self styled naive who has yet to dabble in the pleasures of potentially dangerous vices like... Indian Food.  And Anthony, showing his mellow side, patiently and knowingly is a good friend and makes it alright for Anderson to be himself and find out one of those truths about real life that apparently has thus far escaped him; namely, that Indian Food Won't Kill You and it's actually pretty damn good!

5 seconds into this extremely economically and effectively edited clip we hear Anderson say "Your show has started to make me think about... about food. And about that it's more than just fuel... and, that uh, I don't know... I actually went to Tangiers because you had gone there and done your show on it and I enjoyed your show and I thought... Yeah, that'd be a cool place... so, you've had a big impact ...). And Anthony, as all of this is said to him is smiling that wonderful little smile of his. A smile that seems to me to reveal that he is very pleased to be there at that moment, on television with another of its stars - a kind of "This is SO cool, pinch me so I know I'm not dreaming", smile - a sort of bemused, "Yes, my magic is powerful!" smile - a kind of "You know, this is SO simple, all I had to do was be who I really am and work my ass off for years to make it here!" smile. And he, knowing full well that he is on camera and how to look good on camera, turns to Anderson Cooper and says in a sort of understated, I don't want to brag, but thanks for the compliment,  way "Well, I've done some good in the world." And yes, Anthony you have because Anderson, who is clearly enjoying himself too, and clearly not anticipating any unpleasantness in his mouth or stress to his digestive system, apparently has chosen for this dinner (or was it the show's producer who actually chose) an Indian restaurant. And this launches a discussion accompanied by clips from a variety of Anthony's shows, of India, Indian food, Indian restaurants in India, Punjabi vegetarian food, etc. And let me say that I thoroughly enjoy this video's 2 and half minutes of these  2 experienced, well spoken  gentlemen trading observations about food and travel.  Good stuff!

Just a couple of months ago I took a 2 week tour of India and, as is often the case when one books a commercial tour, you have no choice but to get to know your bus mates somewhat intimately. Astoundingly, there were people on this tour, who for its duration, insisted that they didn't like Indian food even though they hardly had ever tried it. Let me repeat, there they were accompanying me on a tour of India, meal after meal shying away from the glorious food set before us because they were certain that well, you know, "It's curry and it's too spicy!" However, as was plainly demonstrated for us over the course of 35 meals, Indian food offers many, many other things beside curry (the spice) and Curries (the category of dish) and most of it is NOT spicy, unless, of course, you ask the waiter to do you a favor and have the cook make it spicy for you. We had some extraordinary Indian food and some ordinary Indian food and, no, I didn't get Delhi Belly and have to run to the toilet constantly, although I did put on a few pounds due to over eating. And I suppose that at the end of the day, that my having chosen Idly with coconut sauce instead of corn flakes with milk at the hotel breakfast buffet in Agra, for instance, isn't such a big deal. Certainly doesn’t make me a hero. But, this is a big world with all sorts of people, people who over the millenia have scoured their environment for good things to eat and have developed ingenius and very tasty ways to prepare them. And sampling these comestibles is a way to acknowledge that there is much to appreciate on this planet and that part of life’s purpose is to experience and reflect on its variety, and who knows, there may be things to learn and love, and trying unfamiliar stuff may enrich one's life significantly. At least, so it seems to me. And for those fellow travelers on this spinning globe who are tone deaf to the key of life, who just can't seem to hear the song of Planet Earth,  let me finish up here by repeating Anthony's words "Indian food won't kill you!"

Sunday, February 21, 2016

The Record Company That Rejected The Beatles


The Record Company That Rejected The Beatles

As stories go, this one takes the cake. It's one of my favorites and one that has entertained and given pause for deep reflection for a great many over the years. It's a great treat, though, to revisit it by piecing  together a string of YouTube videos. Each one suggests another to follow it, resulting in a very vivid and fresh experience.

The Beatles, that mega famous band from Liverpool,  like all groups, successful or failures, have an origin story, a becoming famous story. This little gem of a video (above) is part of that. The skinny is that The Beatles, while they were still only a local Liverpool act, a band with a strong local following but not much recognition beyond their home turf and no published records or prospects of having any, did have the right manager.

Brian Epstein, owner of a large Liverpool record store, a man who knew the UK recording industry, and who had important connections in it, was determined to get The Beatles a recording contract. Using his influence, he arranged for a much coveted audition for Decca, a significant label at that time. Incredibly, the executive there listened to them play and... turned them down! That's right, this guy - and I'm not sure if he was just a poor dullard who had a particularly off day, or if he was one of the biggest fools in history - had The Beatles come in, set up their equipment, perform a lengthy set for him, and then based on that, decided that they weren't the sort of talent he was interested in signing for his company. By the way, if you've been living under a rock in a galaxy far, far away, The Beatles were quite likely the most popular and successful musical group in the history of the human race (SEE Wikipedia "The Beatles: The best-selling band in history, the Beatles have sold between 600 million[2][3] and (at EMI estimates) over 1 billion units worldwide...")


I think  this story is a perfect focus for those struggling with success and failure, especially those who experience rejection and who seek validation of their voice and work. This audition  didn't result in anything more for The Beatles than their having had to travel to London in a cold van for hours on end and going home exhausted without anything much more than a desire to continue what they were doing. What does it mean that they were rejected by Decca? Whose failure was that?

What I like so much about this story is that failing the audition just didn't matter. And I think The Beatles didn't much care about it. They were doing what they loved and felt things would work out in the end somehow, one way or another... Carpe Diem. I greatly admire that. Further, I think that they knew how good they were and that the world was likely to acknowledge that sooner or later. Or perhaps it wouldn't, but so what? They knew they were very good and did something very special and they were already big winners. And I admire that even more.



Incredibly, this video presents to us 51 years later, a somewhat cleaned up version of the actual audition recordings done on  January 1, 1962. How did that performance go? The story goes that The Beatles were exhausted, hung over, and very much off their game that morning. But play the video! At the very least, what we hear are very competent performances of some rock/pop standards of the day played with style and spirit. This was New Year's day morning and half the population of London was hung over. But hey, there are THOSE voices and guitars, the heavy influence of Elvis, the savvy understanding of the structure of popular songs, and the musical sensibilities that would mature and flourish over the course of the following few years as these guys grew into a monster that would seduce the world.

 

You want irony? As the story goes, Dick Rowe, the guy who turned down The Beatles, did, on other occasions sign very successful acts, like The Rolling Stones, The Moody Blues, and  Tom Jones. His explanation for turning down the most successful act in history was that "Guitar groups are on the way out..." which was probably just a convenient line to throw to their disappointed manager for having blown off his clients. Actually, The Beatles launched a renewed interest in 'guitar bands' that eclipsed any previous interest in them. Rowe much preferred another contender for a Decca contract that he auditioned that day, Brian Poole and The Tremeloes and below is a video of the most successful recording of their career. Although, clearly, these guys had 'something' you still have to stop and wonder about the insight and acuity of a record executive who heard and viewed this group more favorably than The Beatles! 



Brian Poole and The Tremeloes - The Three Bells 

\

The Beatles -Cavern Club 1962 

In this video we see the The Beatles with Ringo Starr on board, which places this scene sometime after Starr replaced original drummer Pete Best in mid August of 1962. This shift in personnel was strongly suggested by  George Martin who signed The Beatles to the Parlophone label and began recording them in June of 1962. The rest is history.

While YouTube would have been far out science fiction during the time The Beatles played together, it performs a vital function for fans of this group who broke up and ceased to work together in 1970, 46 years ago. So acute, though, is the thirst of their admirers and fans, not just to continue, but to deepen their  relationship with them, that YouTube videos on The Beatles continue to be produced and posted with more and more obscure items featured continually. This phenomenon indicates that something much more profound than mere nostalgia is at work behind their creation and consumption. Even for those who remember their emergence into our consciousness and our imaginations through news coverage about their very first visit to the US and their momentous debut on American TV's Ed Sullivan Show, memories of The Beatles go back only to 1964. Curiosity and fondness, though, provide impetus for items to be posted on YouTube that go all the way back to 1960, the very, very beginning of the group's birth. Actually, even back further than that to the lives of Beatles before the group was formed. Clearly there's an emotional hunger for more of something, and the bits and pieces that emerge only perpetuate and intensify that hunger.



The Beatles I Will Always Be In Love With You 1960 Rehearsal

This video comes accompanied by a caption that states " The Beatles taped themselves rehearsing during the spring or summer of 1960 with Stuart Sutcliffe participating.This bootleg is sometimes listed as a 1960 rehearsal recorded in Germany but was actually taped at Paul McCartney's home in Liverpool.The tape contains the only known recordings made during Stu's tenure in the group."

Paul McCartney would have been 18 years old when this was recorded by the way.
These were just young kids. Stu Sutcliffe, by the way, was part of the 5 piece Beetles (earlier spelling of the name), which eventually morphed into the 4 man group the world fell in love with. The final line up of John, Paul, George and... is accounted for by Pete Best being fired and replaced by Ringo Starr as the drummer, and Stu Sutcliffe, bass player, dropping out to pursue his visual art interests. Sutcliffe, by the way, died of a brain hemorrhage in April of 1962, just a few months after his band mates failed their audition for Rowe at Decca in London.



Saturday, February 20, 2016

Bernie Handcuffed for Resisting Arrest?



Does 1963 Video Show Bernie Sanders Being Handcuffed for Resisting Arrest? 


Photo evidence (including digital video) is a very well established approach to proving a point.  The updated take on it that we see in this case, though, is most interesting. Here we have a news clip that has emerged and which is presented not as incontrovertible truth, but as possible/probable truth. Notice that this video's  title, after stating what it hopes it might prove, is punctuated with a question mark. There was a time when news consumers would have insisted on receiving nothing but solid, journalistic ferreting out and presenting of the truth. But we media hungry citizens of the 21st Century want to be included in the process of getting to the truth, or dabbling in getting to it, as early as possible. And we love being entertained by assertions of what is the truth as much as by proven fact, and to us it's all entertainment, anyway. 

Further, while much explanation of this story, that presidential candidate hopeful, Bernie Sanders truly has a life-long history of social consciousness, social activism, and of taking personal risk to support positive American change, has appeared in print news, it really has gotten much more traction through viewers seeing bits and pieces of it in videos, both broadcast on mass media and through YouTube and its clones. But YouTube is much more than video, it is more truly a form of social media that carries, archives, distributes, and facilitates human exchange about video. What's the full story here? That's not so easy to pin down, but we get a somewhat full picture of this story through splicing a few video vignettes together.


 Below is a headline and news segment taken from the NY Times online FirstDraft section. Interesting that the centerpiece is an embedded digital video clip, which both supports the story that appears in text and really provides the very gist and crux of it, as well. I think that the Times has been at the helm of a movement that has moved us to a version of mass journalism that blends and depends of such embedded clips. And while some Luddites and print authenticity snobs may assert that this is watered down news reading, I think that what I get is a far richer experience.

Man Captured on Film Being Arrested in a 1963 Protest is Bernie Sanders, His Campaign Says

In recent days, Hillary Clinton’s campaign has questioned Senator Bernie Sanders’s commitment to civil rights, trying to cement her support among black voters who could be crucial in upcoming primaries such as South Carolina’s.

Is this Bernie Sanders being arrested?
from Kartemquin Films on Vimeo.


A lifeline has now arrived for the Sanders campaign, in the form of film footage more than half a century old. On Monday, a film company, Kartemquin Films, uploaded footage of a young man, wearing thick glasses, surrounded by police officers who grabbed him by his arms and carried him away..."

This particular clip uses the vimeo platform, which strikes me as very, very similar to YouTube. By the way, in addition to possibly verifying Bernie Sanders' claim to having been arrested for standing up for Civil Rights, this video shows some of the lunacy of those times, and I think communicates their flavor in much higher fidelity than print might.  For one thing, back in '63 apparently some very smart individuals concluded that the only way to influence the American 'system' to honor the very constitution under which it was set up, a constitution that promises all Americans equal treatment under the law, was to stage acts of civil disobedience; disrupting traffic, for instance, in order to get a university to desegregate student housing. For another, and this piece of lunacy jumps out of this video at me strongly, is the newspaper clip that shows that Sanders was arrested for resisting arrest. Huh? By any logic I know, he might have been charged with resisting arrest as an ancillary charge to something that you might logically arrest a person for; unlawful assembly, public mischief, creating a public nuisance, something like that. But how do you arrest someone solely for not allowing you to arrest him? Seems to me to be the kind of thing that Alice might have observed the police department of Wonderland do, you know, that place behind the looking glass. Further, we are WITNESSING the arrest in the video. If that's resisting, then what would cooperating look like? Did those cops not like the lack of spring he put into his step as they lead him to and placed him in "the wagon?" C'mon!



Sanders on his arrest during 60's civil rights action

This video (above) appears to have been posted by CNN and at this writing has drawn 12,689 views. As part of our new relationship to media, I guess, eveyone attempts to extract some bandwidth and value from anything that proves itself worthy of 5 minutes of our attention. By the way, check out this headline posted on the CNN website:

"CNN announcesDemocratic town hall